|
posted 08/20/2008 by Chris
The state of Massachusetts had asked a federal judge for a temporary restraining order preventing three MIT students from giving a presentation about hacking smartcards used in the Boston subway system.
"Judge O'Toole said he disagreed with the basic premise of the MBTA's argument: That the students' presentation was a likely violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a 1986 federal law meant to protect computers from malicious attacks such as worms and viruses. Many had expected Tuesday's hearing to hinge on First Amendment issues and what amounts to responsible disclosure on the part of computer security researchers. Instead, O'Toole based his ruling on the narrow grounds of what constitutes a violation of the CFAA. On that basis, he said MBTA lawyers failed to convince him on two points: The students' presentation was meant to be delivered to people, and was not a computer-to-computer 'transmission.' Second, the MBTA couldn't prove the students had caused at least $5,000 damage to the transit system." COMMENTS (displaying 0 comments) POST (leave a comment) |
POPULAR BLOG TAGS
launch
bakery
mbta
drum machines
trice
whoami
php5tube
class
charlie
debuggeddesigns
skateboard
security
mit
youtube
sports
captcha
quicksilver
color
magazine
privacy
code
germans
mailto
snowboard
flash
routes
orwell
as
google
release
boston
brain
published
geek
hobnox
1984
email
gmail
usort
cakephp
open source
science
general
php
spam
rot13
defcon
encryption
ableton
regular expressions
|